To wear? Bikini style, cut fairly high on the thigh. I prefer silky feel, but knit, not "satin" with no give.
To watch on others? On boys, boxer briefs (knit boxers, essentially) On girls? Whatever suits their body type and makes them feel confident.
I don't actually have any thoughts on the Cassini probe, as this is the first I'd heard of it (I don't keep up on the science news the way I should.) I'm all for "more input" however. Are there some controversies about it?
I never did think that. They just don't seem to have a "swinger" vibe to me. No spark between, say Wilma and Barney or Betty and Fred, although I guess you never can tell. Some folks are stealth-kinky. :)
I'm curious as to why you'd clarify "pre-kids," though. Do you think that a couple's sexual preferences/activities/predalictions do/should inherently swing closer to "mainstream" after having children? Does the role of parent inherently carry with it a moral burden to change one's views/practices in regards to sexual activity?
Re: Okay ...
To watch on others? On boys, boxer briefs (knit boxers, essentially) On girls? Whatever suits their body type and makes them feel confident.
I don't actually have any thoughts on the Cassini probe, as this is the first I'd heard of it (I don't keep up on the science news the way I should.) I'm all for "more input" however. Are there some controversies about it?
I never did think that. They just don't seem to have a "swinger" vibe to me. No spark between, say Wilma and Barney or Betty and Fred, although I guess you never can tell. Some folks are stealth-kinky. :)
I'm curious as to why you'd clarify "pre-kids," though. Do you think that a couple's sexual preferences/activities/predalictions do/should inherently swing closer to "mainstream" after having children? Does the role of parent inherently carry with it a moral burden to change one's views/practices in regards to sexual activity?